It’s been reported (Sound On Sound? … https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_152261986166611&key=e4fd14f5d7f2bb6d80b8f8da1354718c&libId=jfhcju8o01024e3t000MA6aukkw83&subId=96da0d780eb78a049c91c2d4428eb2ca&loc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.steinberg.net%2Fforums%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D228%26t%3D101561%26p%3D558649%26hilit%3Dsample%2Brate%2Bconversion%23p558649&v=1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fsrc.infinitewave.ca%2F&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.steinberg.net%2Fforums%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D252%26t%3D119671%26p%3D731407&title=New%20%2F%20Improved%20%2F%20Better%20Sample%20Rate%20Conversion%20(SRC)%20-%20www.steinberg.net&txt=http%3A%2F%2Fsrc.infinitewave.ca ?) that Wavelab’s src is indeed different, and way better than Cubase’s. Looking at the plots of each at that site, it certainly seems like that would be true.